Why do historians hide information about ancient civilizations?

Historians do not generally hide information about ancient civilizations; instead, several factors can lead to gaps in our understanding of the past. Here are some reasons for these gaps:

**Limited Sources**: Many ancient civilizations left behind few written records, and what exists may be fragmentary or difficult to interpret. Archaeological evidence can also be scarce or have been destroyed over time.

**Bias in Historical Accounts**: The sources that do exist may be biased, reflecting the perspectives and agendas of the individuals or groups who created them. This can lead to a skewed understanding of the civilization in question.

**Cultural Interpretation**: Historians interpret ancient evidence through the lens of contemporary values and cultural contexts, which can affect their conclusions and the narrative they present.

**Political and Ideological Influences**: In some cases, the interpretation of history can be influenced by political or ideological agendas, leading to selective emphasis on certain aspects of a civilization while downplaying others.

**Evolving Scholarship**: Historical research is an evolving field. New discoveries can change or challenge previously accepted narratives. As such, what we know about ancient civilizations can change over time as new evidence comes to light.

**Public Accessibility**: Academic work may not always be accessible to the general public. Historians often publish their findings in specialized journals, making it difficult for non-specialists to access the information.

**Miscommunication or Misinterpretation**: Some information may not be well communicated or may be misinterpreted in popular culture, creating the illusion that certain information is being hidden.

In summary, while it may sometimes seem as though information is being concealed, it is typically due to the complexities of sourcing, interpretation, and evolving scholarship rather than intentional concealment.