What if there was an ancient city, but scientists do not believe in its existence and do not want to check it?

The scenario of an ancient city existing but being dismissed by scientists raises intriguing questions about the nature of evidence, belief, and the challenges of archaeology. Here are several considerations that could emerge from this hypothetical situation:

**Alternative Evidence**: Proponents of the city's existence might present alternative forms of evidence, such as oral histories, local legends, or artifacts that suggest the city's cultural significance, even if they lack formal scientific validation.

**Archaeological Methods**: This scenario could prompt discussions on the scientific rigor and methods used in archaeology. In some cases, a reluctance to investigate might stem from a lack of funding, time, or resources rather than outright disbelief.

**Cultural Significance**: The existence of such a city could hold profound meaning for local communities or indigenous populations. They might have their narratives and justifications for the city's historical relevance, which could lead to debates over cultural heritage and the legitimacy of different forms of knowledge.

**Ethics of Scientific Inquiry**: The refusal to check for the city's existence could lead to ethical concerns about the responsibilities of scientists to engage with local narratives and historical claims. It could spark discussions about the balance between skepticism and open-mindedness in research.

**Legitimacy vs. Skepticism**: This situation could fuel debates between the academic community and outsider theories, such as those proposed by amateur archaeologists or conspiracy theorists, who might argue that mainstream science is closed-minded or dismissive of new ideas.

**Potential Discoveries**: If the city were to be discovered, it could have significant implications for our understanding of ancient civilizations, trade routes, cultural exchanges, and social structures that had previously been overlooked or misconceived.

**Public Interest and Support**: A grassroots movement may arise, advocating for the investigation of the ancient city, potentially garnering attention and funding from the public or private sectors. This could place pressure on scientists and institutions to reassess their stance.

**Interdisciplinary Collaboration**: The scenario might encourage collaboration among different disciplines, such as anthropology, history, geology, and even modern technology like remote sensing or ground-penetrating radar, highlighting how multidimensional approaches can potentially uncover lost histories.

Overall, the scenario of an uninvestigated ancient city epitomizes the complexities of knowledge acquisition, the interplay between evidence and belief, and the potential for new discoveries that challenge established norms in academia.