§ 922(d)(1), § 932(b), § 933(a)(1) and § 933(1) and (3).The federal sentencing guidelines have the defendant facing 8-10 years despite having no criminal history, no drugs or violence was involved in the case, the defendant has an ankle monitor followed c

The outcome of a federal sentencing hearing depends on various factors, including the specific circumstances of the case, the recommendations in the presentence investigation report (PSR), the applicable federal sentencing guidelines, and the discretion of the judge. In the scenario you described: 1. **Criminal History**: The defendant has no prior criminal history, which could potentially be a mitigating factor. Many judges take into account a defendant's background when determining sentences. 2. **Nature of the Offense**: Since there were no drugs or violence involved in the case, this may also work in favor of the defendant. Non-violent offenses may receive more lenient sentences than violent ones. 3. **Compliance with Court Orders**: The defendant's compliance with an ankle monitor and regular check-ins with a probation officer demonstrates a commitment to following court orders and could be viewed positively by the judge. 4. **Employment and Acceptance of Responsibility**: Being employed and pleading guilty shows that the defendant is taking responsibility for their actions, which is generally viewed favorably by the court. A plea agreement may already include a recommendation for a lesser sentence due to cooperation with the prosecution. 5. **Sentencing Guidelines**: The federal sentencing guidelines suggest a range of 8-10 years for the offense. However, judges have discretion in sentencing and often consider mitigating factors that could justify a lower sentence. Given these considerations, it is possible that the judge might impose a sentence at the lower end of the guidelines or even below the recommended range, depending on the defendant's circumstances and the arguments presented by both the defense and prosecution. Ultimately, the outcome would depend on the specific details of the case, including the judge's perspective, the presence of any additional mitigating or aggravating factors, and how convincingly the defense argues for leniency. A well-prepared defense attorney could advocate for a more lenient sentence based on the positive aspects of the defendant's situation.