he self-claimed enlightment philosopher. actually, he was nothing but a slave trading investor. he was just one of them. not enlightened at all

It seems you're referring to a figure often associated with Enlightenment thinking but whose actions or beliefs may contradict the ideals of that period, particularly regarding human rights and slavery. Many Enlightenment philosophers advocated for reason, liberty, and the dignity of individuals, yet some were involved in practices that starkly opposed those principles, such as slavery or exploitation. A prominent example is John Locke, who is often celebrated for his ideas on individual rights and governance but also had financial ties to the slave trade in the colonies. This contradiction raises important discussions about the complexities of historical figures, the context of their beliefs, and the ethical implications of their actions. If you have a specific individual or context in mind, please share more details for a thorough examination of the topic!