Is this grammatically correct? What does it mean and can it be rephrased? “The method I employed during my practical exercise was the grass plugs method” “ The method I employed during my practical exercise is the grass plugs method”

Both sentences are grammatically correct, but they convey slightly different nuances based on the verb tense used. 1. **“The method I employed during my practical exercise was the grass plugs method.”** - This sentence uses the past tense ("employed" and "was"), indicating that the action took place in the past. It suggests that the speaker is reflecting back on an earlier practical exercise where they used this method. 2. **“The method I employed during my practical exercise is the grass plugs method.”** - This sentence uses the present tense ("is"), which implies that the speaker considers the grass plugs method to be relevant or applicable currently. It suggests that the reference to the method is still valid at the time of speaking. ### Meaning: - Both sentences essentially communicate that the speaker used the grass plugs method during a practical exercise. However, the first sentence indicates that this was a past action, while the second implies a connection to the present. ### Rephrasing: Here are some rephrased versions of both sentences: 1. **For the first sentence (past tense):** - “During my practical exercise, I used the grass plugs method.” - “The grass plugs method was the technique I applied in my practical exercise.” 2. **For the second sentence (present tense):** - “The technique I am using in my practical exercise is the grass plugs method.” - “The grass plugs method is the one I applied during my practical exercise.” Feel free to use any of these rephrased options depending on the context you wish to convey!