If the city is abandoned, it is better to preserve it until better times and enclose the larger one with an impregnable wall

It sounds like you're discussing a strategy for managing an abandoned city. Preserving the city might offer opportunities for future use, tourism, or cultural heritage, while enclosing it with a wall could serve as a protective measure against potential threats, such as vandalism or encroachment. Here are some considerations for both preservation and enclosure: ### Preservation: 1. **Historical Value**: Preserving the architecture and heritage could attract researchers, historians, and tourists. 2. **Sustainability**: Maintaining the site responsibly could foster ecological benefits, supporting local wildlife and plant life. 3. **Future Opportunities**: The city could be repurposed in the future for habitation, businesses, or community gatherings. ### Enclosure: 1. **Protection**: A wall could deter trespassers and vandalism, helping to maintain the integrity of the structures. 2. **Safety**: Enclosing the area could prevent accidents or injuries to urban explorers or trespassers. 3. **Control Access**: Controlled access can facilitate guided tours or limited public events without overexposing the site. ### Combined Approach: - **Mixed-use Development**: Consider developing parts of the city while preserving historical areas, creating a blend of new and old. - **Community Engagement**: Involve local communities in discussions about the city's future, emphasizing stewardship and collective ownership. - **Art and Culture**: Utilize the space for art installations, cultural events, or festivals that can breathe new life into the area while preserving its history. In summary, a thoughtful approach that balances preservation and protection could maximize the potential of an abandoned city while respecting its historical significance.